Synoptic Studies
Many of the techniques employed by the Upper Arkansas Research Team
at St. Kevin Gulch are now being used at other sites affected by acid
mine drainage. The streams under study are typically headwater systems
that gain significant amounts of water as they flow down valley. The
sources of additional water range from well-defined tributary inflows
that appear on topographic maps, to diffuse groundwater inflows that
are not visible to the naked eye. The water quality associated with
these sources of water also varies dramatically, ranging from dilute
mountain springs to metal-rich waters emanating from mineralized areas.
The challenge facing those interested in stream water quality is thus
one of source determination: In a given watershed, what sources of water
are most detrimental to the system under study? This question is of
paramount importance to land managers who have limited resources with
which to implement remedial actions.
The problem of source determination may be addressed by employing
two well-established techniques: the tracer-dilution method and synoptic
sampling. The tracer-dilution method provides estimates of stream discharge
that are in turn used to quantify the amount of water entering the stream
via tributary and groundwater inflow. Synoptic sampling of instream
and inflow chemistry provides a spatially-detailed 'snapshot' of stream
water quality. When used in unison, these techniques provide a description
of the system that includes both discharge and concentration. Discharge
and concentration data may be used to determine the mass loading associated
with various sources of water. Sources representing the greatest contributions
in terms of mass loading may then be the target of remedial actions.
Details on several synoptic studies are presented below.
Colorado
Montana
Utah