
Animas River
Eureka to Howardsville
August 7-15, 1998
Objectives & Sequence of Events
Objectives
The reach of the upper Animas River between the old town of Eureka to
the town of Howardsville, Colorado is a candidate for stream restoration.
An understanding of the hydrology and the pattern of metal loads in that
stream reach will strengthen planning for restoration.
Objectives of the tracer-injection study in this reach of the Animas
River include:
- Determine (for low flow conditions) if the stream reach is a net
sink or source of metals to the downstream areas. Channel restoration
may alter the current effect of this reach on the Animas River downstream,
so an understanding of how the current channel works will help with
planning.
- Determine any substantial sources of metal loads in the Animas
River from Eureka to Howardsville. There are suspected "buried"
tailings in past channels of the Animas River. The tracer study
may point out the effects of buried tailings on the metal loads.
- Identify former stream channels in the alluvial material by the
movement of tracer. If there is still alluvial flow through old
channel paths, the tracer may indicate where these paths re-enter
the current channel. A similar situation was indicated by tracer
in French Gulch, Colorado.
Sequence of Events
| August |
| 7 |
Stream measurement and reconnaissance |
| 10 |
Preparation of salt solution for tracer-dilution |
| 11 |
Pre-synoptic Sampling (0700 - 1000) |
| 11 |
Tracer Injection Begins (1000) (aborted in
p.m. due to pump failure) |
| 12 |
Tracer Injection Begins (1002) |
| 13 |
Spot Injections |
| 14 |
Synoptic Sampling |
| 14 |
Tracer Injection Terminates (1930) |
| 15 |
Sampling of Tracer Departure |
Photo Gallery
Sampling Locations
| str | - stream site
|
| rbi | - right bank
inflow |
| lbi | - left bank
inflow |
| 999 | - number
corresponds to distance from injection site, in meters. |
Results & Acknowledgments
Results
Data analysis is incomplete at this time.
Acknowledgments
The Eureka to Howardsville synoptic was done in cooperation with
the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Field assistance
was provided by Ken Leib, Bill Carey, and members of the
research team.